I tried out Adobe Firefly Video because I wanted a dependable tool for converting full-length videos into short-form content while keeping everything sharp and manageable. I brought in my longer recordings and watched how it created portrait-style clips with tight framing and engaging starts.

The initial versions appeared very neat. The AI seemed to grasp timing and flow rather than making random cuts.

I focused on the on-screen text since it’s crucial for keeping viewers watching Shorts. The words appeared in smart spots, stayed easy to read, and never covered people’s faces or key moments. I could tweak the appearance without messing up the arrangement or needing to rebuild everything.

I evaluated this AI YouTube Shorts generator with different types of content, including how-to guides, direct-to-camera footage, and informal recordings. The output quality remained steady no matter what format I used, so I could maintain a unified look across my channel. It didn’t force a cookie-cutter approach on everything.

While testing Premiere on iPhone, I wanted to figure out whether it is solely suitable for video editing or can work as a YouTube Shorts maker AI tool as well. I took longer YouTube clips and transformed them into catchy Shorts without having to manually slice up every second.

I brought in interview footage, how-to videos, and clips of people talking directly to the camera, then used automatic resizing, clip detection, subtitles, and smart trimming features. Right away, I could tell this wasn’t some 1-click button that does everything instantly. It is an additional powerful instrument for content creators who take their work seriously.

From the get-go, I tried automatic portrait-mode conversion. The AI did an impressive job keeping people’s faces in the middle of the screen when flipping landscape videos into the tall 9:16 format for Shorts, even as speakers shifted around.

My next step was exploring the automated subtitle system and how it manages video tempo. The AI-created captions were remarkably precise and perfectly timed with the audio. This is essential for Shorts since most people browse with their sound off.

I played around with different video lengths. It was very straightforward to try out various opening hooks by chopping off the initial moments and watching the results right away. While this Shorts AI tool doesn’t automatically make compelling intros on its own, it lets you locate and improve them swiftly.

I also wanted to see how efficiently I could churn out numerous Shorts from one lengthy piece of content. By making duplicate copies of my project and allowing the AI to manage the vertical orientation adjustments and caption creation, I transformed a single 20-minute recording into several upload-ready Shorts in under an hour. Everything worked perfectly.

To test Adobe Express, I uploaded some longer videos and turned them into vertical clips. Then I added text on screen, switched between scenes, and put in simple moving effects.

This YouTube Shorts generator AI was really easy to figure out. I didn’t have to spend time learning complicated features. I got good-looking results almost right away. I think it is a wonderful option for people who want their videos to look professional without spending hours on editing.

I could easily put subtitles on my videos and move them around so they didn’t cover up people’s faces or important stuff in the clip. Thanks to the pre-made animation templates, my Shorts looked more interesting without going overboard.

I tried out the Adobe Express free version by creating different kinds of videos such as quick tutorials, promotional content for a regular customer, and casual posts for social media. Everything turned out neat and well-presented.

Still, this AI Shorts video generator isn’t designed for elaborate narratives or movie-style production. Several features seemed somewhat limited compared to editors, where you can adjust everything.

I was curious whether Opus Clip could spot the best moments in videos. I put in my longer videos and let the free AI YouTube Shorts generator choose the highlights on its own. The clips it selected were actually good. I paid attention to whether the clips had good beginnings and endings. Most of them started in ways that grabbed attention and wrapped up smoothly.

I tested this YouTube Shorts app using interviews, teaching videos, and direct-to-camera content. It excelled when voices were crisp and the content had good structure. Emotional scenes were sometimes overlooked, but replacing footage was straightforward.

The batch upload feature is so helpful. I was able to upload multiple lengthy videos at once and receive an entire collection of short clips from just one processing round. Each one was already edited and subtitled. The platform also lets me customize how long each clip should be, which helps me create Shorts anywhere from 15 to 60 seconds based on where I plan to post them.

To test Pictory, I dropped in complete webinars and how-to videos, then stepped back while AI handled everything. I was surprised by how accurately this YouTube Shorts maker free AI spotted the crucial parts of my content. It figured out where natural breaks occurred and pinpointed the essential ideas, breaking everything down into bite-sized pieces without me having to lift a finger.

The automatic subtitles impressed me a lot. The tool “listened” to my audio and turned it into text all by itself, then split everything into nice little sections that matched up perfectly with what was happening on screen. I had to fix a couple of small mistakes here and there, but generally, it saved me hours compared to typing out captions manually.

Another cool thing I discovered was how this app for video captions would recommend making certain words stand out, either by making them pop with animation or just making them bold. Thanks to those little touches, my Shorts look way more professional than I expected.

I fed my tutorial clips and interview recordings into InVideo AI, and the platform analyzed everything and recommended which parts to use, handled the cutting on its own, and even pitched different storytelling angles for short-form content.

Text overlays appeared automatically, too. The AI pulled out important words and phrases to highlight on screen. This YouTube Shorts maker AI also recommended how scenes should flow, what transitions to use, and which background music fits the vibe. Sections with quick dialogue became punchy shorts, while detailed explanations got a bit more breathing room.

I tested this AI clip maker with two different types of content – educational and chatty ones. I liked how it shifted its approach: for the teaching-style videos, it is recommended to use short, straight-to-the-point clips. But when I used casual footage, it got creative and suggested clips of different lengths with a more fun vibe.

I checked how quickly VEED Editor could turn full-length videos into vertical short clips without much effort on my part. I threw in some tutorial content and commentary videos, and it picked out the best moments by looking at how clear the audio was and what looked visually appealing. It chopped everything down and organized it into bite-sized pieces that viewers would want to watch.

The captions that this AI Shorts video maker produced came with perfect timing and were broken up so they were easy to understand. It even figured out the smartest spots to put them where people would notice them most. I liked how it studied the video’s flow and tweaked each clip’s duration based on how people were speaking.

It missed some of the more nuanced emotional moments here and there, but most of what it created was basically ready to upload straight away.

I wanted to see how Vozo handled videos with talking and voice-overs prevailing. The AI listened to the audio and pulled out the most interesting parts to turn into Shorts. It grabbed the important sentences, cut out all the “umms” and rambling bits, and created short vertical videos ready for YouTube Shorts.

I was impressed by how it automatically added captions that matched up perfectly with what was being said. It even figured out which words needed emphasis and threw in some subtle visual touches and backgrounds to make the narration pop. It is clearly built for making voice-based Shorts, offering more than basic free video editors for YouTube.

I rely on this AI tool to make YouTube Shorts for tutorials, commentary tracks, and educational content. The AI performed well when the speaking was organized and easy to follow. But when I threw casual conversations at it, I sometimes had to go back and manually pick better clips.

I was in a time crunch and needed to make a bunch of Shorts, so I used 2ShortAI to see if it could handle creating multiple videos at once. I uploaded long videos, and it chopped them up into shorter clips, picking out the key moments and interesting visuals automatically. It was cool that it created different versions with various hooks, so I could choose the one seemed most engaging.

On top of that, it added captions by itself, threw in some simple text effects, and even adjusted how long each clip should be depending on where I planned to post it. This YouTube Shorts clip maker AI analyzed how fast people were talking and the speech energy to figure out if a clip worked better at 15 seconds, 30, or a full minute.

If I added messier, off-the-cuff stuff, I had to tweak things a bit, but even then, this free video editing app gave me something solid to work with right out of the gate.

I kept seeing people rave about Lumen5 on the forum, especially for making Shorts from scripts or text instead of chopping up existing videos. So, I dropped in some lengthy video transcripts and scripts to see what would happen. The AI just took over from there. It picked out the important lines, condensed different sections, and threw together visuals and captions without my efforts.

I liked how this AI YouTube Shorts creator handled the rhythm of everything. It knew when to break up those rambling, complex sentences into bite-sized pieces, and when to let a quick one-liner hit hard for impact. Plus, it is recommended to use stock footage and little animations that actually made sense with what I was saying.

This AI video editor stumbled a bit with the emotional or funny moments. It didn’t nail the timing or emphasis on those parts, but a few quick tweaks fixed it up pretty easily.

My colleague kept bugging me to try Canva photo editor for making YouTube Shorts, even though it’s not really built specifically for that. So, I tried it with some longer videos. The AI picked out clips, converted everything to vertical format, and slapped on some text overlays.

This AI YouTube Shorts generator was pretty smart about finding the good parts of my videos and telling me where each Short should start and stop. Captions popped up automatically and synced with what was being said. Depending on what kind of content I had, it suggested different template styles and where to put text. It even added some little animations to make things more interesting.

I tried it out with tutorials, announcements, and some short promo clips. Most of the time, the AI handled the important parts. When my content was a bit all over the place, I had to manually fix what the AI picked, but adjusting things was super easy.

I checked YouTube Dream Screen to see how its built-in AI handles creating Shorts right in the app. Instead of having to manually edit clips, it automatically makes background visuals and adds contextual layers on top. I uploaded my raw footage, and the AI jumped in with suggestions for enhancements, effects, and how to frame everything for Shorts.

It added auto-generated captions and recommended tweaks to the timing, too. This YouTube Shorts maker AI looked at how my video flowed and what was happening visually, then suggested the best clip lengths. For playing around and testing stuff out, it was great.

I used this free video editor for YouTube mostly for casual content and testing ideas promptly. It won’t replace a full-fledged video editor, but it speeds up Shorts creation with automated suggestions. The AI actually worked better than I expected.

I spent more time testing CapCut because it’s built specifically for creating Shorts with AI. I dropped in my long videos and the AI picked out good clips, found the best hooks, reformatted everything for vertical video, and added captions automatically. It even looked at how I was speaking, visual energy, and transitions to get the pacing right.

This AI Shorts generator stays on top of trends. It suggested edits that matched what’s working on TikTok and Shorts right now, so everything felt native to those platforms. Captions, animations, and effects were added automatically, but I could still jump in and adjust them if I wanted to.

I tested this AI software with tutorials, reaction videos, and regular vlogs. Every time, the AI found great hooks, picked solid cuts, and made clean vertical clips. Even when I threw random, unpolished footage at it, the results were almost good enough to post right away.

My FixThePhoto team and I tested popular AI YouTube Shorts generators to find out which ones actually work. We didn’t just review them, we used them as real creators would.

We tested how they picked highlights, made vertical videos, added captions, and made visual improvements. Basically, we wanted to see if these tools could handle our actual workflow for client projects.

We tested these tools with tutorials, interviews, product demos, and casual content. Each of us uploaded the same footage to different AI generators to see how they handled it.

We watched how fast the AI spotted key moments, created short clips, and built them into Shorts on its own. We checked the captions, timing, visuals, and whether the AI caught those important first-few-seconds hooks that grab attention.

Then we compared results by creating draft Shorts and reviewing them together. We scored each tool on accuracy, pacing, captions, visuals, and time saved versus editing manually. Kate looked at the workflow and ease of use. Tati checked how well the AI chose highlights and built the story. Tetiana focused on captions and timing. I tracked overall performance.

We also checked which tools were able to create multiple clips at once, which programs understood trends better, and which solutions needed the most tweaking.

Thus, we get a clear view of what each YouTube Shorts maker AI does well and where it falls short in real content creation. By the end, we knew which tools actually speed up Shorts production, which need more hand-holding, and which work best for producing lots of content automatically.